Britney Spears’ request to remove father as conservator rejected – for now at least

A judge has denied a request by Britney Spears to remove her father as her conservator – for the time being at least.

New documents show that the judge has responded to a request made by Spears‘ lawyer Samuel Ingham III in November, at which point he said the 39-year-old star was scared of her father, Jamie, and did not want him to manage her multimillion-dollar estate.

While this previous request to remove her father has been denied, the judge’s decision is not in direct response to the explosive and emotional testimony given by the singer in court last week – as Spears is still yet to officially file a petition to end the conservatorship completely.

People protest in support of pop star Britney Spears on the day of a conservatorship case hearing at Stanley Mosk Courthouse in Los Angeles
Image:#FreeBritney supporters protested outside the court as Spears gave evidence in June

In court filings from November, which have previously been made public, Spears said she wanted private wealth management firm the Bessemer Trust appointed as “sole conservator”.

But the new document, filed on 30 June, shows that Judge Brenda Penny refused the request while approving Bessemer Trust’s role as co-conservator.

The legal document states: “The conservatee’s request to suspend James P Spears immediately upon the appointment of Bessemer Trust Company Of California, NA as sole conservator of estate is denied without prejudice.”

However, there will be more to come following Spears’ dramatic testimony in court – a hearing she requested was held publicly after months of many taking place in private.

More on Britney Spears

  • Britney Spears: Christina Aguilera shares message of support for star over conservatorship legal battle

  • Britney Spears conservatorship: Jamie Lynn Spears says she is ‘so proud’ of her sister ‘using her voice’

  • Britney Spears apologises to fans for ‘pretending to be ok’ over her conservatorship

  • Britney Spears case ‘says so much’ about misogyny in entertainment and controlling nature of music industry

  • Britney Spears: Stars send messages of support after conservatorship court speech

  • Britney Spears conservatorship: It was clear everyone in court was stunned by what they heard

In a speech given remotely to the court in Los Angeles, the star described the controversial arrangement that has controlled her life for 13 years as “abusive”, and likened the way she is treated to victims of sex trafficking.

Spears claimed that she had been denied any privacy, was not allowed to remove her contraceptive device, and had been stopped from marrying her boyfriend.

“I want my life back,” she told the court.

FILE PHOTO: Britney Spears poses at the premiere of "Once Upon a Time In Hollywood" in Los Angeles, California, U.S., July 22, 2019. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni/File Photo
Image:Spears, 39, has described the conservatorship as ‘abusive’

Spears’ father has been her conservator – giving him control of most of her personal and financial decisions – for the majority of the time since she suffered a mental breakdown in 2008.

Following the star’s evidence, in which she also alleged she was given medication without her consent, the 68-year-old has now filed a petition to investigate her claims – and denied he is responsible for his daughter being unable to get married or have children.

His team has asked the court to “investigate the veracity of the allegations made”, which he has repeatedly denied, saying he only wants the best for his daughter.

Will Britney Spears case trigger a reckoning in the music industry?

Will Britney Spears case trigger a reckoning in the music industry?

Mr Spears also suggested that Jodi Montgomery – who was made his co-conservator in 2019 and put in charge of Britney’s personal and medical decisions, while he remains in control of finances – should be looked into.

In his petition, he claimed to be “concerned about the management and care of his daughter” and said that Ms Montgomery does “not reflect her wishes”.

“Mr Spears is simply not involved in any decisions related to Ms Spears’ personal care or medical or reproductive issues,” the filing states.

“It is unclear whether it is appropriate for Ms Montgomery to serve in that role or for that matter, whether the continued conservatorship of Ms Spears’ person is appropriate.”

No marriage or babies and 'exploitation': The claims made by Britney Spears to court

No marriage or babies and ‘exploitation’: The claims made by Britney Spears to court

It adds Mr Spears has been “cut off from communicating” with Ms Spears but says that when he was overseeing her personal affairs, he supported her decision to marry.

Following Spears’ testimony, she has received support from the #FreeBritney movement as well as many celebrities, including her former boyfriend Justin Timberlake, singer Christina Aguilera, and her sister Jamie Lynn, who praised her for “using her voice”.

Posting on Instagram after the hearing, Spears apologised to fans for not being honest about her feelings over her controversial conservatorship.

In a lengthy message, the singer said she regretted “pretending she was ok for the last two years” but that pride and embarrassment prevented her from admitting the truth.

Mark Gibson

Graduates in Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 1990. Move to Los Angeles California in 2004. Specialized in Internet journalism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *